Difference between revisions of "SMHS BigDataBigSci CrossVal"

From SOCR
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "== Big Data Science - Internal) Statistical Cross-Validaiton == == Questions == * ==Overview== ==See also== * SMHS_BigDataBigSci_SEM| Structura...")
 
(Questions)
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
== Questions ==
 
== Questions ==
*
+
 
 +
• What does it mean to validate a result, a method, approach, protocol, or data?
 +
 
 +
• Can we do “pretend” validations that closely mimic reality?
 +
 
 +
[[Image:SMHS_BigDataBigSci_CrossVal1.png|250px]]
 +
 
 +
''Validation'' is the scientific process of determining the degree of accuracy of a mathematical, analytic or computational model as a representation of the real world based on the intended model use. There are various challenges with using observed experimental data for model validation:
 +
 
 +
1. Incomplete details of the experimental conditions may be subject to boundary and initial conditions, sample or material properties, geometry or topology of the system/process.
 +
 
 +
2. Limited information about measurement errors due to lack of experimental uncertainty estimates.
 +
 
 +
Empirically observed data may be used to evaluate models with conventional statistical tests applied subsequently to test null hypotheses (e.g., that the model output is correct). In this process, the discrepancy between some model-predicted values and their corresponding/observed counterparts are compared. For example, a regression model predicted values may be compared to empirical observations. Under parametric assumptions of normal residuals and linearity, we could test null hypotheses like ''slope'' = 1 or ''intercept'' = 0. When comparing the model obtained on one training dataset to an independent dataset, the slope may be different from 1 and/or the intercept may be different from 0.  The purpose  of the regression comparison is a formal test of the hypothesis (e.g., ''slope'' = 1, ''mean'' <sub>''observed''</sub>  =''mean<sub>predicted</sub>,'' then the distributional properties of the adjusted estimates are critical in making an accurate inference. The logistic regression test is another example for comparing predicted and observed values. Measurement errors may creep in, due to sampling or analytical biases, instrument reading or recording errors, temporal or spatial sampling sample collection discrepancies, etc.
  
 
==Overview==
 
==Overview==

Revision as of 09:06, 10 May 2016

Big Data Science - Internal) Statistical Cross-Validaiton

Questions

• What does it mean to validate a result, a method, approach, protocol, or data?

• Can we do “pretend” validations that closely mimic reality?

SMHS BigDataBigSci CrossVal1.png

Validation is the scientific process of determining the degree of accuracy of a mathematical, analytic or computational model as a representation of the real world based on the intended model use. There are various challenges with using observed experimental data for model validation:

1. Incomplete details of the experimental conditions may be subject to boundary and initial conditions, sample or material properties, geometry or topology of the system/process.

2. Limited information about measurement errors due to lack of experimental uncertainty estimates.

Empirically observed data may be used to evaluate models with conventional statistical tests applied subsequently to test null hypotheses (e.g., that the model output is correct). In this process, the discrepancy between some model-predicted values and their corresponding/observed counterparts are compared. For example, a regression model predicted values may be compared to empirical observations. Under parametric assumptions of normal residuals and linearity, we could test null hypotheses like slope = 1 or intercept = 0. When comparing the model obtained on one training dataset to an independent dataset, the slope may be different from 1 and/or the intercept may be different from 0. The purpose of the regression comparison is a formal test of the hypothesis (e.g., slope = 1, mean observed =meanpredicted, then the distributional properties of the adjusted estimates are critical in making an accurate inference. The logistic regression test is another example for comparing predicted and observed values. Measurement errors may creep in, due to sampling or analytical biases, instrument reading or recording errors, temporal or spatial sampling sample collection discrepancies, etc.

Overview

See also




Translate this page:

(default)
Uk flag.gif

Deutsch
De flag.gif

Español
Es flag.gif

Français
Fr flag.gif

Italiano
It flag.gif

Português
Pt flag.gif

日本語
Jp flag.gif

България
Bg flag.gif

الامارات العربية المتحدة
Ae flag.gif

Suomi
Fi flag.gif

इस भाषा में
In flag.gif

Norge
No flag.png

한국어
Kr flag.gif

中文
Cn flag.gif

繁体中文
Cn flag.gif

Русский
Ru flag.gif

Nederlands
Nl flag.gif

Ελληνικά
Gr flag.gif

Hrvatska
Hr flag.gif

Česká republika
Cz flag.gif

Danmark
Dk flag.gif

Polska
Pl flag.png

România
Ro flag.png

Sverige
Se flag.gif